Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 08:35:39PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> In its current form, there are implementation flaws and violations
> that I do not consider acceptable, and deploying this kind of thing is
> highly irresponsible and harmful to your users.

Can you please explain what these (heck, what even _one_ of these) are?

As far as I know the code was written following the published documentation.
That's how Internet protocol development works, is it not?


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index