Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Build error when crypto and swcrypto are omitted from kernel

On Sun, 10 May 2020, Michael van Elst wrote: (Paul Goyette) writes:

Well, 90%+ of the effort has already been expended, so why not?

90%+ is probably the time needed to test optional builds in the future.

FWIW, I have just successfully completed my build of my custom kernel
(and an entire `` release'') and it correctly included the
rijndael stuff (even without the two {,sw}crypto pseudo-devices).

And I'd like to talk to Martin, since 100% of the task is done if
we just add the missing dependency without the option. Even an
#ifdef SMALL could be easier to maintain.

Yep, that would work, too.  I'm open to either approach, just would
like to move forward.

| Paul Goyette       | PGP Key fingerprint:     | E-mail addresses:     |
| (Retired)          | FA29 0E3B 35AF E8AE 6651 |     |
| Software Developer | 0786 F758 55DE 53BA 7731 |   |

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index