Re: Build error when crypto and swcrypto are omitted from kernel

[mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst)]

paul%whooppee.com@localhost (Paul Goyette) writes:

>> Well, 90%+ of the effort has already been expended, so why not?

90%+ is probably the time needed to test optional builds in the future.

>FWIW, I have just successfully completed my build of my custom kernel
>(and an entire ``build.sh release'') and it correctly included the
>rijndael stuff (even without the two {,sw}crypto pseudo-devices).

And I'd like to talk to Martin, since 100% of the task is done if
we just add the missing dependency without the option. Even an
#ifdef SMALL could be easier to maintain.

-- 
-- 
                                Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
                                "A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."