[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Jemalloc fallout on sandpoint
In article <20190408213840.GA11779%orion.coris.org.uk@localhost>,
Julian Coleman <jdc%coris.org.uk@localhost> wrote:
>Upgraded my QNAP TS-201 (sandpoint) to current, and all binaries crash with:
>assertion: "PAGE_ADDR2BASE(addr) == addr"
>  Abort trap (core dumped) sh
>Not sure how we can pass in an address that isn't the page base address here.
>It looks like the allocations from pages.c have the same assertion, so they
>shouldn't cause this. Could base_block_alloc() be allocating a block that
>starts at an address that isn't a multiple of the page size? Should we
>assert "PAGE_ADDR2BASE(block) == block" every time we allocate a block?
The problem is that on powerpc we use MAX_PAGE_SHIFT not the right page
shift for the machine. I will fix it to compute and use the MIN_PAGE_SHIFT
Main Index |
Thread Index |