Re: Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)

To: David Holland <dholland-pkgtech%netbsd.org@localhost>, Leonardo Taccari <leot%NetBSD.org@localhost>, tech-pkg%NetBSD.org@localhost, Pierre Pronchery <khorben%defora.org@localhost>, current-users%netbsd.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)
From: dholland%netbsd.org@localhost (David A. Holland)
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 03:20:04 +0000

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 06:52:56PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
 > > then there's agc's objection to negative boolean variables, which I
 > > tend to agree with; instead of [snip]
 > 
 > But it's not a yes/no variable, it's a list of files.

er, I think I knew that at some point...

although making such a mistake is also a sign the names aren't so
good.

In the absence of other ideas I like jperkin's suggestion...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- PaX mprotect now on for amd64
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64
  - From: David Brownlee
- Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64
  - From: Pierre Pronchery
- Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)
  - From: Leonardo Taccari
- Re: Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)
  - From: David Holland
- Re: Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)
  - From: Thomas Klausner

Prev by Date: daily CVS update output
Next by Date: Re: wm devices don't work under current amd64
Previous by Thread: Re: Some pkgsrc/mk/pax.mk suggestions (was: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64)
Next by Thread: Re: PaX mprotect now on for amd64
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index