On Thu 15 Oct 2015 at 06:57:42 +0700, Robert Elz wrote: > I do wonder about ... > > | procfs on /usr/pkg/emul/linux32/proc type procfs (read-only, local) > | procfs on /usr/pkg/emul/linux32/proc type procfs (local) Ah good catch. That seems to be a botched attempt to mount the linux procfs /inside/ the chroot. But I made a typo somewhere. That used to be needed in the past for building some package I think, but since I don't have it on my main machine that is probably not true any more. > Especially since some of the tstile processes you showed are doing > lookups under namei_tryemulroot() However the getcwds should not come near that proc directory, since it is outside the chroot. > Do you really need that mounted twice like that, and if not, can you try > with one of them missing and see if the problem remains ? Good idea, I'll try that later! > kre -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- The Doctor: No, 'eureka' is Greek for \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- 'this bath is too hot.'
Description: PGP signature