Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: named unable to bind to address?

To: "John D. Baker" <jdbaker%mylinuxisp.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: named unable to bind to address?
From: Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 08:56:43 +0200

On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 09:23:58PM -0500, John D. Baker wrote:
> This works quite well.  In fact,
> 
>   !sleep 1
> 
> is sufficient to let 'named' successfully bind to the IP address of the
> "bge1" interface.

Sounds like a named bug to me then.

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: named unable to bind to address?
  - From: Niels Dettenbach

References:
- named unable to bind to address?
  - From: John D. Baker
- Re: named unable to bind to address?
  - From: John D. Baker
- Re: named unable to bind to address?
  - From: Eric Haszlakiewicz
- Re: named unable to bind to address?
  - From: John D. Baker
- Re: named unable to bind to address?
  - From: John D. Baker

Prev by Date: Re: named unable to bind to address?
Next by Date: Re: named unable to bind to address?
Previous by Thread: Re: named unable to bind to address?
Next by Thread: Re: named unable to bind to address?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index