Re: Test failures

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 08:10:05AM +0200, Jukka Ruohonen wrote:
> 
> Just because there is a HEAD branch, and "that's the way we have always
> developed", does not mean better alternatives should not be considered.

I did not say what you put in quote marks.  I'm sure you didn't mean to
imply that I did, but just to be clear.

Also, the existence of alternatives does not imply that one of them is
necessarily better than the current alternative; only that they exist.

There might be some workflow that is better overall than the one we have
now, but I am pretty sure "every developer stops and runs the complete
set of anita tests before every commit" is not it, or, at least, not quite
it.

Thor