Re: raidframe performance question

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Fri, May 06, 2011 at 04:26:05PM -0700, Paul Goyette wrote:
> On Fri, 6 May 2011, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> >> c: 976768002       63    unused     0    0      # (Cyl.   0*- 969015*)
> >> d: 976773168        0    unused     0    0      # (Cyl.   0 - 969020)
> >> e: 976768002       63      RAID                 # (Cyl.   0*- 969015*)
> >
> >... and your partitions are not aligned.
> >
> >Please change the offset of "c" and "e" to block 64.
> 
> Duh.   :)

Hang on a minute.  The sectors are numbered starting with 0 -- aren't they
already aligned?

Thor