[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: acpicpu(4) strangeness
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:04:36AM -0700, Sverre Froyen wrote:
> Is the bug in the ACPI table? If so, I seem to remember an option to load
> patched ACPI tables from the root file system.
That is possible, as documented in acpi(4). However, there are obstacles:
1. First of all, this is not sustainable. We could fix it for
Dustin, but the bug would remain there for someone else to
2. On Intel systems, the "CPU tables" are usually not the same as
the "main table". We have no easy way to patch these.
3. The contents of Intel IA32_PERF_CTL and IA32_PERF_STATUS registers
remain to be undocumented. In other words, patching the tables
would require knowledge of what to put in there. Given that these
registers are also model-specific, we would have the same
problems as with est(4), which operates largely on educated
guesses and can guarantee entirely reliable operation only with
the early Pentium M CPUs that were meticulously tabulated.
Main Index |
Thread Index |