[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: SMSC LAN9118 Family driver
From: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:01:48 +0900
> > > I.e. is the EEPROM backend dependent or each evaluation board dependent?
> > No, isn't. Maybe it evalusion board dependent.
> > > If some on-board ISA-based smsh(4) doesn't have EEPROM
> > > but other smsh(4) on the ISA slot might have EEPROM,
> > > it should be handled by proplib, like wm(4) on iyonix.
> > I think that the case is very rare. I think that I can remove EEPROM.
> > For instance, re(4) and tlp(4), etc. Should we use proplib in
> > if_ethersubr.c::ether_ifattach() if it worries about such a case?
> On-board wm(4) on iyonix doesn't have EEPROM and it uses proplib.
It use in pci/if_wm.c.
> On-board ahc(4) on O2 doesn't have EEPROM and it uses proplib.
For this case, it use in pci/ahc_pci.c. Not use in ic/aic7xxx.c.
> Of course we can handle it with proplib in backends, but
> I can't comment about it because there is no backend source
> in your diff.
My older version source.
Main Index |
Thread Index |