Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: panic in atomic_inc_32

On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 01:21:10AM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:03:04PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
>  > With an i386 kernel, yesterday's source, running on an intel SU9400 (or 
> SU9300?)
>  > 
>  > _atomic_inc_32(0,0,400,...)

That's a NULL pointer dereference, isn't it?

> ...there is nothing like a panic call in _atomic_inc_32, which is only
> four instructions long. Nor does the word 'atomic' appear in
> vfs_lookup.c. Are you sure ddb isn't lying to you? What was the panic
> message?

Presumably, not from atomic_inc_32, but certainly you could trap there.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index