Current-Users archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: panic in atomic_inc_32

On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 03:03:04PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
 > With an i386 kernel, yesterday's source, running on an intel SU9400 (or 
 > SU9300?)
 > _atomic_inc_32(0,0,400,...)
 > namei
 > vn_open
 > kobj_load_file

...there is nothing like a panic call in _atomic_inc_32, which is only
four instructions long. Nor does the word 'atomic' appear in
vfs_lookup.c. Are you sure ddb isn't lying to you? What was the panic

David A. Holland

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index