Re: pam-ldap vs. -current

[Greg Oster <oster%cs.usask.ca@localhost>]

Jeff Rizzo writes:
> Not sure if I should send this to a pkgsrc list instead (which one?),
> but building the security/pam-ldap package under -current results in a
> pam_ldap.so that's missing some critical functions - like
> pam_sm_authenticate().  When built under 4.0, the symbols are there. 
> Does this have something to do with having openldap in base?  Am I
> missing something blindingly obvious?

Nope.. but there's already a PR on it... 

http://www.netbsd.org/cgi-bin/query-pr-single.pl?number=39313

Later...

Greg Oster