Current-Users archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NFS client renders system unusable
bsd-xen%roguewrt.org@localhost ("Sarton O'Brien") writes:
>The system at least now responds but nfs still eventually locks up:
># /etc/rc.d/mldonkey stop
>Stopping mldonkey.
>Waiting for PIDS: 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904,
[...]
>904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904nfs server
>192.168.15.8:/usr/local/svc/mldonkey: not responding
>, 904, 904, 904nfs server 192.168.15.8:/usr/local/svc/mldonkey: is alive
>again
>, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904, 904,
[...]
>And it's highly unlikely it will ever actually terminate without a -9.
If it does terminate with a -9 then there is no more NFS lockup but
probably a bug in the application.
>1006 904 1 0 2 2 24 19 7904 37920 parked DW- ttyp0
>0:05.07 /usr/pkg/libexec/mldonkey/mlnet -pid /var/run/mldonkey
>1006 904 1 0 1 2 76 19 7904 37920 nfsrcv DW ttyp0
>0:05.07 /usr/pkg/libexec/mldonkey/mlnet -pid /var/run/mldonkey
> 0 3640 377 0 1 1 85 0 748 1108 wait DW ttyp0
>0:00.06 /bin/sh /etc/rc.d/mldonkey stop
All your processes seem to be swapped out? Seems to be srange.
>The problem seems to occur when more files are added to the list that is
>maintained by mldonkey, which are subsequently managed over nfs by the
>program. The program obviously wasn't designed for this use but do you
>have any idea what I might need to do to accomodate it? I have increased
>vfs.nfs.iothreads
iothreads should be scaled by number of CPUs available, the Solaris people
said "number of CPUs + number of active network interfaces + 1".
It is generally a bad idea to increase it.
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index