Re: ghostscript and jemalloc

[Mark Davies <mark%mcs.vuw.ac.nz@localhost>]

On Wed, 05 Mar 2008, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Potentially is is a bug with ghostscript and gets exposed by
> jemalloc. Simon found a similar bug in pax recently. It seems that
> jemalloc causes more activity on freed memory.

Yes, I'm quite willing to believe that the bug is in ghostscript and I 
have an open bug about it at bugs.ghostscript.com (#689711) but it 
would be useful to confirm that other people are seeing the bug.

cheers
mark