[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Fw: [ANNOUNCE] libxshmfence 1.0
> On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 10:06:06AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> > DRI3 will need xshmfence, which currently only supports Linux Futexes.
> > Here's some discussion about this from the xorg-devel mailing list.
> > Perhaps someone knowledgeable in pthreads can join in?
> > [...]
> : The existing Linux DRM interfaces queue rendering to the GPU in the
> : order requests are made to the kernel, so we don't need the ability to
> : serialize within the GPU, we just need to serialize requests to the kernel.
> seems like telephoning your boss to check if you can send him an
As far as I knew DRM was more done in Linux Kernel. The Original Developer
was from Europe, and had to face a lot issue after he had developed in Linux,
not software but lot court cases.
> Why not serialize requests *in* the kernel? Or is this just yet
> another DRM architectural deficiency?
How would you ? This is not being followed any where, be it proprietory.
-- Sujit K M
Main Index |
Thread Index |