Re: tolower()/islower() and char

To: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
Subject: Re: tolower()/islower() and char
From: Robert Elz <kre%munnari.OZ.AU@localhost>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 00:04:14 +0700

    Date:        Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:54:45 -0500 (EST)
    From:        Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>
    Message-ID:  <202101141554.KAA18877%Stone.Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>

  | I don't have any POSIX reference

POSIX says the same thing you quoted for X99 about EOF (int with a negative 
value) - which is no big surprise, for C related issues, where POSIX says
anything at all, it is usually just a copy from the C standard.

kre

References:
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Mouse
- tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Martin Husemann
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Manuel Bouyer
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: Mouse
- Re: tolower()/islower() and char
  - From: David Holland

Prev by Date: Re: tolower()/islower() and char
Next by Date: Re: tolower()/islower() and char
Previous by Thread: Re: tolower()/islower() and char
Next by Thread: Re: tolower()/islower() and char
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index