There was an announcement that bind will be not updated. Topic "bind -> unbound/nsd " "Hello, The recent change of ISC/bind licensing from BSD to MPL for the next release has provided us with an opportunity to re-evaluate the preferred daemon status for NetBSD and DNS resolution. Board/Core have decided not to import the next version of bind, and instead import the current version of unbound/nsd. If you feel that this creates problems for you, let us know. Also you should be able to use newer versions of bind from pkgsrc. We are not planning to de-support or remove bind for NetBSD-8. Best, christos " Aug 18, 2016; 3:54p http://netbsd.2816.n7.nabble.com/bind-gt-unbound-nsd-td348989.html Was this statement changed? Personally I don't have an opinion either way as long as we keep python out of src. On 27.05.2020 16:11, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > ----- Forwarded message from Christos Zoulas <christos%netbsd.org@localhost> ----- > > Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 15:26:41 -0400 > From: Christos Zoulas <christos%netbsd.org@localhost> > To: source-changes%NetBSD.org@localhost > Subject: CVS import: src/external/mit/libuv/dist > Reply-To: source-changes-d%NetBSD.org@localhost > > Module Name: src > Committed By: christos > Date: Sun May 24 19:26:41 UTC 2020 > > Update of /cvsroot/src/external/mit/libuv/dist > In directory ivanova.netbsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv18348 > > Log Message: > Import libuv, needed by bind-9.16.x > > ---- > > Why was this import not discussed before it happened? I remember quite a > few concerns about the long term state of BIND and whether it wouldn't > be better to drop it (potentially in favor of Unbound), so it seems > somewhat rude to just import another not so small and redundant library > without any discussion. > > Joerg >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature