tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally

To: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 18:09:09 +0100

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> Upstream libc++ maintainers are against patching libc++.

I'm buffled how you are arriving at this conclusion. Let me reiterate:
STOP MESSING UP THE TREE.

Joerg

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

References:
- Expose max_align_t unconditionally
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski

Prev by Date: Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
Next by Date: Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
Previous by Thread: Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
Next by Thread: Re: Expose max_align_t unconditionally
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index