[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: RFC: Change to the way sh -x works?
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2017 12:32:00 +0100
From: Edgar =?iso-8859-1?B?RnXf?= <ef%math.uni-bonn.de@localhost>
| > For this, stderr is remembered only when tracing turns from off to on,
| > if it is on already, and another "set -x" is performed, nothing changes.
| I can't unambigiously parse that.
Not a surprise. Writing English isn't what I do well (but that is not to
mean that writing in some other natural language would be easier, of those
English is the only rational choice, though I occasionally demean myself
and write American instead...)
In a more natural form (the actual code looks nothing like this)...
/* we are processing "set -x" */
if (xflag == 1)
xflag = 1;
x_trace_file = stderr;
| From further reading, I guess it's a no-op.
Main Index |
Thread Index |