[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Xlocale for NetBSD
>>>>> On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 17:45:14 -0700,
Konrad Schroder <perseant%hhhh.org@localhost> said:
> The benefits of adopting xlocale would be:
> * Per-thread locale settings
> * Working LC_COLLATE settings
> * Use localedef(1) instead of mklocale(1), which allows...
> * Take locale definitions directly from CLDR
These are all great.
> but, at least at the moment, has these drawbacks:
> * No ISO2022 codemap
> * No compatibility support; e.g. existing test binaries crash
This means it has an ABI compatiblity problem, doesn't it?
How about merging both current citrus staff and the xlocale staff?
* merge the LC_COLLATE staff to the citrus framework.
* merge the localedef(1) staff to the citrus framework.
* add the per-thread APIs.
> The current diffs are available at
I'll look at this.
Main Index |
Thread Index |