Re: sched_protect(2)

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Hi Rocky,

  As Christos mentioned, you can help to improve the man pages here.
If you want to take it, please add the information that Christos wants in
the
current page and also makes man sched_protect works.
After you complete it, you can either send the pull request on our github,
https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite    in patches/prioprotect folder,
or post the patch in the mail list, so that we can send you feedbacks.
Let me know if you want to do it, and I will focus on problems in real time
signals.


Thanks Charles.

2016-08-01 9:55 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:

> On Aug 1,  4:28pm, rockyhotas%post.com@localhost ("Rocky Hotas") wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: sched_protect(2)
>
> | I am just an enthusiast and not a developer; I used pthreads some
> | months ago and noticed that sched_protect is already mentioned in
> | sched(3). Is there something that I can do to help you writing or
> | reviewing the man page, or is this kind of work better fitted for
> | the developers' team?
>
> Hi, Rocky,
>
> Anyone can help. As you correctly pointed out, there is a summary
> in sched.3, but we need to mention that -1 restores the original
> priority (popping a level) and make sure that there is also a link
> to it, so 'man sched_protect' works. Please coordinate here with Charles
> on who is doing what, so that we don't do things twice.
>
> | Bye :),
>
> Best,
>
> christos
>