Re: updates?

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

I will study FreeBSD logic first and share with you guys.

2016-07-17 6:39 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:

> On Jul 17,  2:02am, charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: updates?
>
> | Hi Christos,
> |
> |   I considered the questions that you asked.
> | Here is another patch that improves the previous one in terms of error
> | checking
> |
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/patches/SIGNAL/0003-improve-error-checking.patch
> |
> | I have checked the queue size is the total number instead of per signal.
> | my patch can pass the tests here,
> |
> https://github.com/ycui1984/posixtestsuite/blob/master/conformance/interfaces/sigqueue/9-1.c
> | which can work as an unit test.
> | In terms of the sig queue delivery order, for real time signals, I need
> to
> | familiar with the
> | consuming logics in the netbsd code base. I guess maybe we need to sort
> | real time signals when enqueuing,
> | or selecting the correct real time signal when consuming.
> |
> | My action items,
> | to familiar with signal consuming logic in netbsd, to make sure real time
> | signals are always consumed based on its signal number (the smaller the
> | real time signal number, the earlier to be consumed.)
>
> Thanks. What does FreeBSD do? Can we have a separate queue for realtime
> signals and deliver those first?
>
> christos
>