Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX

[Charles Cui <charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost>]

Yeah, I will try to construct a new test.


Thanks, Charles.

2016-06-22 15:28 GMT-07:00 Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>:

> On Jun 22,  3:11pm, charles.cui1984%gmail.com@localhost (Charles Cui) wrote:
> -- Subject: Re: _SC_SIGQUEUE_MAX
>
> | Thanks Christos for these comments!
> | In terms of the new fields exposed by sched_param, those are only for
> | testing convenience, if we decide to expose those to users, we need to
> | consider carefully.
>
> Does not matter, if we expose them or not. If the structure size changes,
> it breaks the ABI... We just need to decide what to do. I don't think it
> is that useful to expose them... Anyway if we change it we should decide
> if we want to include the sporadic scheduler stuff so we don't have to
> keep burning syscalls (or version the structure).
>
> | In terms of the testing method proposed by you, did you already implement
> | and test
> | or want me to provide the test?
>
> Why don't you give it a try...
>
> Thanks,
>
> christos
>