Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]

To: Morgan ``Indrora'' Gangwere <morgan.gangwere%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed%reedmedia.net@localhost>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 15:44:20 -0500 (CDT)

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016, Morgan ``Indrora'' Gangwere wrote:

> Currently, I know of no services that are easily deployed on inetd
> except bozohttpd and potentially BIND. 

BIND would not be easy nor really useful via inetd.

Some other common services that are easily deployed:
tftp
pop3
ftpd

Other services used via inetd are cvspserver / anoncvssh, rsyncd, 
ntalkd, qotd/fortune, and fingerd for fun.

(I have used it for many things, such as sshd -i, ftp-proxy, even 
streaming real-time audio.)

References:
- inetd improvements [gsoc16]
  - From: Morgan ``indrora'' Gangwere
- Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
  - From: Morgan ``indrora'' Gangwere
- Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
  - From: Morgan ``Indrora'' Gangwere

Prev by Date: Re: Proposal for several minor changes to sh
Next by Date: Re: pidfile_lock(3)
Previous by Thread: Re: inetd improvements [gsoc16]
Next by Thread: cp -i might violate POSIX
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index