tech-userlevel archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: S_IFMT not mentioned in any man page
> FUTURE DIRECTIONS
> No new S_IFMT symbolic names for the file type values of
> mode_t will be defined by POSIX.1-2008; if new file types are
> required, they will only be testable through S_ISxx( ) or
> S_TYPEISxxx( ) macros instead.
That strikes me as stupid of them. You can't write
switch (st_mode satisfying)
{ case S_ISTHINGY(selector):
...;
}
(though arguably maybe you should be able to :-).
Of course, NetBSD can define new S_ITHINGY names even if POSIX won't.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index