[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Revisiting the migration path to Kyua
On Feb 16, 2014, at 8:04, Andreas Gustafsson <gson%gson.org@localhost> wrote:
> Given that both tools run the same tests, I agree that running both
> would be wasteful. Maybe we could add a command line option like you
> suggested, but make it fall back to ATF when Kyua is selected but not
> available, as the case may be when testing a historic version?
I don't have a strong preference (it's your software after all!), but
_personally_ I'm not a big fan of such automatic fallbacks. If the user says
--test-engine=kyua, then I'd expect the software to do as I said or fail if
it's not possible. (However if instead the user said --test-engine=auto, then
it'd be just fine to detect Kyua and fall back to ATF if not present.) Up to
you really. Maybe a tristate (--test-engine=[atf|kyua|auto]) is nicest?
Do you want me to come up with a draft diff for this?
Main Index |
Thread Index |