[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: "dynamic" fstab
asau%inbox.ru@localhost (Aleksej Saushev) writes:
>mlelstv%serpens.de@localhost (Michael van Elst) writes:
>> martin%duskware.de@localhost (Martin Husemann) writes:
>>>On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:39:16AM +0400, Aleksej Saushev wrote:
>>>> I find it stupid to put UUID into a field that is meant to be
>>>> just to work around an obvious defect in operating system.
>>>I agree - there should be a UUID= equivalent to NAME=.
>> Not all disk partitions have a UUID. I also do not think that
>> UUIDs are particularly userfriendly. If UUIDs are meant to
>> provide a workaround for name conflicts, I rather suggest
>> that such conflicts should be resolved automatically by
>> generating new names possibly derived from the original
>Even less disk partitions have unique "NAME".
Interesting enough, almost all do unless you explicitely set
them to something identical. And every disk we currently support
that has something like a UUID will have exactly that as a NAME.
The only conflicting scenario I am aware of are Apple users
that regularly name their partitions all alike and who then share
the partition with NetBSD.
Michael van Elst
"A potential Snark may lurk in every tree."
Main Index |
Thread Index |