tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: [PATCH] libpthread NOLOAD removal

YAMAMOTO Takashi <> wrote:

> it means that the representation of a locked mutex is incompatible
> between w/ and w/o libpthread.  it contradicts the purpose of
> the patch, isn't it?

Yes, I now think that approach is not going to be successful. I posted
in another message today test cases where I dsiscovered it would break.

We can either decide to not support code sharing a mutex between code
using the libc stub and code using the libpthread implementation, or to
move almost all libpthread in libc.

Emmanuel Dreyfus

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index