[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Replacing bind by unbound
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012, Jochen Kunz wrote:
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:02:33 +0100
Martin Husemann <martin%duskware.de@localhost> wrote:
What do you think?
I think dnsmasq would fit most peoples requirements as thoese
requirements are typically quite simple. If you really need more
complex things, well, there is still pkgsrc/net/bind*. I prefere
simple, small things in base and to push the more complex things to
That's my color sugestion for the bikeshed. ;-)
I second this suggestions. A fullblown DNS server is not really
necesssary for a run-of-the-mill machine.
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
Main Index |
Thread Index |