[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Replacing bind by unbound
On 31/10/2012 10:02, Martin Husemann wrote:
What it can not do (easilay/apparently - I didn't dig too deep),
I do with bind a lot, is serve a local view of a zone to the inside
net, that differs from the official outside view. It can be told to
a different primary server for such a case though, which would have
meant for me to run nsd as well on a different port and have unbound
forward queries there - while with bind I can do this with a single
What do you think?
I second the import of unbound. I would also argue the need to import
nsd as well.
What I do is run nsd on my external addresses and unbound on my
internal addresses instead of using different ports.
My only grip is that neither product currently offers dynamic dns
Main Index |
Thread Index |