tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Adding memset_s function

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 01:38:21PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Frankly, I think we should first discuss whether we want to implement
> the *_s crap first or not. IMO it's all a waste of disk space and time
> and I have no idea what the Working Group was thinking when they even
> considered it. I mean who else can see something wrong with a proposal
> that includes gets_s and snprintf_s?

I agree in general, but the memset_s (and IIRC sprintf_s) are mostly sane,
so I see no problem in cherry picking them.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index