tech-userlevel archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Proper interface for finding the ELF auxilary vector

On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 03:09:28PM +0100, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 01:27:18PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > Old libc works fine with newer ld.elf_so. "backwards compatible" means
> > that newer ld.elf_so works with older libc, not the other way around.
> I think you misunderstood: not talking about the suggested change at hand,
> but a hypothetical future one. You said you use void* as return value
> because it might change.

No, I'm using void * because the *data* can be changed. I mean this in
contrast to using const void *, not as in using a different type.


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index