Re: Why no SIGINFO?

[Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:21:45 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:

> >> +  (void)signal(SIGINFO, progress);
> > I'm not sure if others will agree, but I think that sigaction(2) is
> > prefered to select(3) nowadays.
> 
> I assume you meant signal(3), not select(3); preferring sigaction to
> select is a bit like preferring sqrt to strlen.  That said:

Oh, absolutely :)  Thanks for the correction.
-- 
Matt