[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Why no SIGINFO?
On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 18:21:45 -0500 (EST)
Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost> wrote:
> >> + (void)signal(SIGINFO, progress);
> > I'm not sure if others will agree, but I think that sigaction(2) is
> > prefered to select(3) nowadays.
> I assume you meant signal(3), not select(3); preferring sigaction to
> select is a bit like preferring sqrt to strlen. That said:
Oh, absolutely :) Thanks for the correction.
Main Index |
Thread Index |