Re: Why no SIGINFO?

[Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost>]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2012 09:06:26 -0600
Daniel Loffgren <miyokojiro%gmail.com@localhost> wrote:

> +     (void)signal(SIGINFO, progress);

I'm not sure if others will agree, but I think that sigaction(2) is
prefered to select(3) nowadays.  This is BSD code intended for BSD
though, so it might not matter, perhaps.

Thanks for working on this,
-- 
Matt