On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:42:32 +0100 Julian Fagir <gnrp%komkon2.de@localhost> wrote: > > The FreeBSD service shell script looks like it would be mostly > > portable except for the jails and $local_startup variable. > attached is the service script that fits for NetBSD, with no further > modifications were made to the copyright statement or rcs. > > If you don't have any objections, please commit it or tell me what to do with > it (include it manually in the program?). Not that I object, but I don't understand what advantages such a wrapper would provide... Also, would the direct rc.d scripts invokation eventually be deprecated/discouraged because of a services wrapper (as is the case on Ubuntu where I get an annoying warning everytime I invoke an init.d script directly)? Thanks, -- Matt
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature