[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Proposal for write(1) addition
> /dev/tty is a cloning device. You open it and get a new pty master.
I sure hope /dev/tty was a typo, there.
> Not being able to reopen the master is design choice -- it avoids all
> the nasty race conditions that let to the creation of revoke.
Well, perhaps you know more about the motivations of those who created
revoke() than I do. But it seems to me that revoke() is needed for
real-hardware tty lines anyway, and, once you have the mechanism to
forcibly take a process's tty away from it, there's no reason not to
use it for ptys as well - quite independently of whether you can reopen
As for it being a design choice - that's really got nothing to do with
it; you may note that none of what I wrote has anything to do with
whether inability to expose the master device in the filesystem was a
design choice or an accident of the implementation or what.
/~\ The ASCII Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse%rodents-montreal.org@localhost
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B
Main Index |
Thread Index |