Re: mksh import

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 06:30:14PM -0600, Dad - Kent - wrote:
> 
> IMO, this is pretty much a no-brainer. With ksh93 performance,
> it's functionality, continued development and improvement, and the
> fact it is becoming the defacto standard, I think ksh93 should be
> the default / base shell in NetBSD.

So we should just ignore the license issues?

Thor