Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested

To: tech-userlevel%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
From: Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:27:03 -0400

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 01:40:12AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> 
> There are two issues with using funopen() for this purpose:
> 
> (1) It limits the portability of the code quite a bit.

It's part of the current Unix standard...

Thor

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

References:
- Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Jean-Yves Migeon
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Thor Lancelot Simon
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
Next by Date: Re: libcodecs(3), take 3
Previous by Thread: Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
Next by Thread: Re: Proposed addition of strcodecs(3) library - review requested
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index