[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: typedef int wchar_t;
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> The part adding !defined(__cplusplus) is fine, the part using
> !defined(__ICC) is not.
I know it's not right. In fact, I didn't ask NetBSD developers to
commit my patch as-is. I reported what worked. And __ICC is there
because I often compile NetBSD and packages with gcc on the same
box and I didn't want to hit a subtle bug.
But if you believe __cplusplus guard is safe, I'd happy to revert
my local changes.
Main Index |
Thread Index |