[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: definition of NULL correct?
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:38:53AM -0400, der Mouse wrote:
> I don't see why. Plenty of expressions - mostly involving casts -
> become syntax errors when you tack a "sizeof" on in front of them. I
> don't see anything prohibiting "NULL" from being another.
The principle of least surprise suggests that NULL should not expand
to something that syntactically functions differently from a single
But that's not part of the standard, yes. :-)
> (especially since I believe NULL should never be used)
Should I ask why or is that borrowing trouble?
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |