[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: terminfo implementation
Here's a new snapshot.
It should now implement all documented ncurses terminfo capabilities.
The tic(1) implementation is a lot faster than before and is 3 times
quicker than ncurses tic :)
Both tic(1) and infocmp(1) now sport the -x flag to control acceptance
of non standard capabilities. If you have tried a previous snapshot,
you'll need to rebuild your databases.
In addition to the standard cap_long_name macros to access a cap quickly
on cur_term, we have t_cap_long_name macros to access a cap quickly on
any TERMINAL struct which would make any merge with our curses library a
little less painless.
It also has a termcap compatibility layer and is source and binary
compatible with our current libtermcap provided that NO NetBSD
extensions have been used. Only ul(1) and curses(3) use this in the tree
according to my grep search. Whilst curses(3) does have an excuse to use
them (see prior discussions for why) ul(1) does not so I'm pretty sure
we can just drop them.
On the whole, most people are generally positive about this.
I've taken on board some comments by Joerg and changed some code
accordingly, but more eyes would be better.
Main Index |
Thread Index |