[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: nssd (was RFC: Going the LDAP/Kerberos way with NetBSD.)
On 1209658063 seconds since the Beginning of the UNIX epoch
Christos Zoulas wrote:
>My experience with nssd has only been pain. While it is a good idea if
>properly implemented, I have not seen a proper implementation of it and
>I don't think that it is easy to write one. Issues:
>1. It introduces a level of cacheing which can lead to annoying
> consistency issues if there is more cacheing happening at the
> directory server level. What would be ideal is to teach all
> the directory server backends to do uncached calls when they
> are contacted by nssd.
>2. It introduces an extra context switch for each lookup. This is
> why sun invented doors.
You could implement a small cache in libc to avoid this in most
cases. Given that the largest advantage of caching is generally
achieved in a short time, a 1s cache would be probably be enough.
Roland Dowdeswell http://www.Imrryr.ORG/~elric/
Main Index |
Thread Index |