On 02-Dec-99 Eduardo E. Horvath wrote:
> Unfortunately, it's not clear it will work with this proposal either.
> But we should try to make it work.  That is the primary advantage you
> can gain through PROVIDES/REQUIRES that you can't easily get through
> run levels: building arbitrary run levels as needed.


This would be a fantastic win..  Especially if the opposite were true..  If I
shut down service "foo", everything that requires foo should come down as well.
 Perhaps first.
---
Tim Rightnour <root@garbled.net>
NetBSD: Free multi-architecture OS http://www.netbsd.org/
NetBSD Mailing lists on the web: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/