Re: Lua man-pages not in comp set?

[christos%astron.com@localhost (Christos Zoulas)]

In article <trinity-68452bba-9493-4c0c-a903-82e936a6aeb4-1419527253257@3capp-mailcom-bs14>,
Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost> wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I can miss the point, but what's the reason to put Lua documentation
>man3lua and man9lua in man.tar.gz?
>man3 and man9 are in comp.tar.gz
>
>I doubt that anyone will be interested e.g. in a Lua kernel hacking
>without the comp set.

You are right, file a PR and we'll see what others say.

christos