[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: libfl.a -> libfl.so?
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:52:47PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> When linking a shared library with libtool against libfl.a it
> *** Warning: linker path does not have real file for library -lfl.
> *** I have the capability to make that library automatically link in when
> *** you link to this library. But I can only do this if you have a
> *** shared version of the library, which you do not appear to have
> *** because I did check the linker path looking for a file starting
> *** with libfl and none of the candidates passed a file format test
> *** using a regex pattern. Last file checked: /usr/lib/libfl.a
> Is there a reason we don't provide a libfl.so?
It is tiny and trivial.
My vote would be to make libtool less stupid...
David A. Holland
Main Index |
Thread Index |