tech-toolchain archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited

To: tech-toolchain%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
From: David Laight <david%l8s.co.uk@localhost>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 17:21:40 +0000

On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 05:10:36PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> 
> The primary reason for going with m4 is simply that m4 allows a number
> of things to be done more sanely.

I don't recall anything at all about m4 being sane.

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
  - From: der Mouse

References:
- Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger
- Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
  - From: Christos Zoulas
- Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
  - From: Kurt Lidl
- Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
  - From: Joerg Sonnenberger

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Fix NetBSD native bootstrap
Next by Date: Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
Previous by Thread: Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
Next by Thread: Re: Traditional cpp and assembler, revisited
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index