Re: build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir

To: tech-toolchain%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir
From: der Mouse <mouse%Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA@localhost>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2008 04:28:14 -0400 (EDT)

>> It seems to me that an install of an already-built tree should be
>> something one can do read-only.
> Yes, it should be.

>> What's the thinking on this?  [...]
> Please send-pr, [...]

toolchain/38487.

/~\ The ASCII                           der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML               mouse%rodents.montreal.qc.ca@localhost
/ \ Email!           7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B

References:
- build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir
  - From: der Mouse
- Re: build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir
  - From: Alan Barrett

Prev by Date: Re: build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir
Next by Date: Linking libc into shared libarries (was: CVS commit: src/share/mk)
Previous by Thread: Re: build.sh install vs RO objdir/destdir
Next by Thread: Linking libc into shared libarries (was: CVS commit: src/share/mk)
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index