Re: bad package build of gcc10

["John D. Baker" <jdbaker%consolidated.net@localhost>]

On Mon, 21 Oct 2024, John D. Baker wrote:

> Not netbsd-10 and gcc10, but I'm seeing the same failure with gcc12 on
> -current/amd64 (10.99.12).
> 
> I had built with "-j 5", MAKE_JOBS=5 (4-core CPU).
> 
> Now trying a build with "-j 1" (MAKE_JOBS=1).

The MAKE_JOBS=1 build completed without the complaints about the missing
required libraries (which the package actually provides).

It seems, however, that for some reason there was no previously-installed
build of gcc12, so 'make replace' failed.  'make package-install' did
not provoke any complaints.

After the MAKE_JOBS=5 build failed, I manually ran "make MAKE_JOBS=1
replace package clean" and although it failed because there was no
gcc12-foo package to replace, it didn't complain about missing required
libraries, but I suspect that was because it failed checking for a
previously-installed gcc12-foo package rather than checking the just-
built gcc12 prior to the attempted replacement.

-- 
|/"\ John D. Baker, KN5UKS               NetBSD     Darwin/MacOS X
|\ / jdbaker[snail]consolidated[flyspeck]net  OpenBSD            FreeBSD
| X  No HTML/proprietary data in email.   BSD just sits there and works!
|/ \ GPGkeyID:  D703 4A7E 479F 63F8 D3F4  BD99 9572 8F23 E4AD 1645